National Technical Assistance and Evaluation Center for Systems of Care
Demonstration Sites, References, and Additional Resources
California - Partnering4Permanency - Valerie Earley, Project Director, email@example.com
Colorado - Jefferson County System of Care - Susan Franklin, Project Director, SFrankli@jeffco.us
Kansas - Family Centered Systems of Care - Beth Evans, Project Director, firstname.lastname@example.org
Nevada - Caring Communities Project - Tom Morton, Project Director, MortonTD@co.clark.nv.us
New York - The CRADLE in Bedford Stuyvesant: A Systems of Care Initiative - Nigel Nathaniel, Project Director, Nigel.Nathaniel@dfa.state.ny.us
North Carolina - Improving Child Welfare Outcomes Through Systems of Care - Eric Zechman, Project Director, email@example.com
North Dakota - Medicine Moon Initiative: Improving Tribal Child Welfare Outcomes Through Systems of Care - Deb Painte, Project Director, firstname.lastname@example.org
Oregon - Improving Permanency Outcomes Project - Patrick Melius, Project Director, Patrick.J.Melius@state.or.us
Pennsylvania - Locally Organized Systems of Care - Andrea Richardson, Project Director, email@example.com
Bass, S., Shields, M. K., & Behrman, R. E. (2004, Winter). Children, families, and foster care: Analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children, 14(1), 4-29.
Bazemore, G. (2006). Performance measures: Measuring what really matters in juvenile justice. Alexandria, VA: American Prosecutors Research Institute.
Behn, R. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
Blome, W., & Steib, S. (2007). An examination of oversight and review in the child welfare system: The many watch the few serve many. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1(3), 3-26.
Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2003). Improving the performance and outcomes of child welfare: The real opportunity of the Child and Family Services Reviews through state Program Improvement Plans (PIP). Washington, DC: Author.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. Guiding principles of systems of care. Retrieved August 14, 2009, from /management/reform/soc/history/accountability
Children's Bureau. Child and Family Services Reviews fact sheet. Retrieved January 24, 2009, from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/resource/cfsr-fact-sheets
Koppell, J. G. S. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of "multiple accountabilities disorder." Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94-108.
Langley, G., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (1996). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
Mears, D., & Butts, J. (2008). Using performance monitoring to improve the accountability, operations, and effectiveness of juvenile justice. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19(3), 264-284.
North Dakota Department of Human Services. (2009). FFY 2007 children and family services statistical bulletin.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sahonchik, K., Frizsell, B., & O'Brien, M. (2005). Systemic issues in child welfare: Strategic planning for child welfare agencies. Child Welfare for the Twentieth Century. (pp. 719-727). Retrieved January 24, 2009, from SocINDEX with Full Text database.
Schorr, L. (2006, October). Common purpose: Sharing responsibility for child and family outcomes. New York, NY: National Center for Children in Poverty, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health. Available from https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8SF34XJ (PDF - 170 KB)
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2003). States face challenges in developing information systems and reporting reliable child welfare data. Available from https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-04-267t
Woodbridge, M., & Huang, L. (2000). Using evaluation data to manage, improve, market, and sustain children's services. Systems of Care: Promising Practices in Children's Mental Health, 2000 Series, Volume II. Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research. Available from https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/18242154/using-evaluation-data-to-manage-improve-market-and-sustain-
The following online resources offer valuable information for child welfare practitioners, administrators, and community partners and feature ready-to-use tools and examples from the field.
Free Management Library
Child Welfare Information Gateway: Logic Model Builder
University of Wisconsin: Program development and evaluation resources
Harvard Family Research Project: Evaluation exchange
Tools for self-evaluation in child welfare, compiled by Dr. Lynn Usher, University of North Carolina
The National Technical Assistance and Evaluation Center for Systems of Care is funded by the Children's Bureau, under contract with ICF International. The Center assists and supports grantees funded through the Improving Child Welfare Outcomes Through Systems of Care demonstration initiative by providing training and technical assistance and a national evaluation of the demonstration initiative. Contact: Aracelis Gray, NTAC Project Director, 9300 Lee Hwy, Fairfax, VA 22031, 703-225-2290, firstname.lastname@example.org.
This material may be freely reproduced and distributed. However, when doing so, please credit Child Welfare Information Gateway.