 |
 |
|
|||||||||
RSS
 |
Home > Concurrent Planning > References
Concurrent Planning: What the Evidence Shows
Issue Brief
References Brinsont-Brown, C. (1995). The history of foster adoption as a factor in concurrent planning in San MateoCounty. Unpublished document. Daly City, CA: San Mateo Department of Human Services. Cahn, K. (2003). Lutheran Community Services Evaluation Report. Seattle, WA: University of Washington School of Social Work. Retrieved January 2004 from http://depts.washington.edu/nwicf/EvalServ/LCS Final Report.pdf Children's Bureau. (2004). General findings from the Federal Child and Family Services Review. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. Retrieved January 2004 from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/cwmonitoring/results/genfindings04/index.htm Colorado Department of Human Services (2003). Ninth Annual Report to the Colorado Legislature on the Implementation of Expedited Permanency Planning. Denver, CO: Author. D'Andrade, A. C., Choice, P., Martin, M., & Berrick, J. (2001). Concurrent planning: The influence of new practices on permanency outcomes in child welfare. Abstract retrieved January 2004 from http://sswr.org/papers2001/324.htm Katz, L. (1999). Concurrent planning: Benefits and pitfalls. Child Welfare, 78(1), 71-87. Landsman, M. J., Malone, K., Tyler, M., Black, J., & Groza, V. (1999). Achieving permanency for teens: Lessons learned from a demonstration project. University of Iowa, National Resource Center for Family Centered Practice. Retrieved January 2004 from http://www.uiowa.edu/7Enrcfcp/publications/documents/Fall1999.pdf Lutz, L. (2000). Concurrent planning: Tool for permanency: Survey of selected sites. New York: Hunter College School of Social Work, National Resource Center for Foster Care and Permanency Planning. Lutz, L. (2003). Achieving permanence for children in the child welfare system: Pioneering possibilities amidst daunting challenges. New York: Hunter College School of Social Work, National Resource Center for Foster Care and Permanency Planning. Malm, K., Bess, R., Leos-Urbel, J., Geen, R., & Markowitz, T. (2001). Running to keep in place: The continuing evolution of our nation's child welfare system. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved January 2004 from www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/310358_occa54.pdf Martin, M. H., Barbee, A. P., Antle, B. F., & Sar, B. (2002). Expedited permanency planning: Evaluation of the Kentucky Adoptions Opportunities Project. Child Welfare, 81(2), 203-224. Munroe, F. (1997). Pathways to permanent placements for young children in high-risk situations. In E.Wattenberg (Ed.), Redrawing the family circle: Concurrent planning - Pathway to permanence for young children in high-risk situations. University of Minnesota School of Social Work, Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare. National Resource Center on Foster Care and Permanency Planning. (n.d.). Concurrent Planning Curriculum Module 2: Differential assessment to prevent foster care drift. Retrieved February 2004 from www.hunter.cuny.edu/socwork/nrcfcpp/downloads/cpp/module2-diff-assess.pdf Northwest Resource Center for Children and Families. (2003). Lutheran Community Services concurrent planning evaluation, Stuart Foundation final report. Seattle, WA: Author. Potter, C. C., & Klein-Rothschild, S. (2002). Getting home on time: Predicting timely permanency for young children. Child Welfare, 81(2), 123-150. Schene, P. (2001). Implementing concurrent planning: A handbook for child welfare administrators. University of Southern Maine, National Resource Center for Organizational Improvement. Westat & Chapin Hall Center for Children. (2001). Assessing the context of permanency and reunification in the foster care system. Report submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved January 2004 from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/fostercare-reunif01/
This material may be freely reproduced and distributed. However, when doing so, please credit Child Welfare Information Gateway. |
||||||
|
|||||||
Email
Print (PDF 156 KB)
Share
Rate This
