
|
Home > Program Evaluations: A Synthesis of Lessons Learned by Child Neglect Demonstration Projects > Appendix B: Project Evaluation Information
Program Evaluation: A Synthesis of Lessons Learned by Child Neglect Demonstration Projects
Grantee Lessons Learned
Author(s): United States. Children's Bureau.
|
| Year Published: 2005 |
Appendix B: Project Evaluation Information
| |
Program Evaluation |
Desired Outcomes |
Evaluation Tools and Instruments |
Report Outcomes |
| Family Intervention Program |
Outside evaluator
Comparison group
No random assignment reported
Three standardized scales
Pre- and post-intervention
Statistical analysis of data |
Reduce substance abuse, reduce emotional and economic problems, and increase parenting skills
Reduce health, academic, behavioral, social, and emotional problems in project children
Keep family unit intact and minimize the involvement of high-risk project families with child welfare services
Test overall efficacy of the program and compare efficacy with two groups |
Family Stress Inventory (Orkow, 1985)
Parenting Skills Inventory
Family Risk Scales (seven scales modified from Magura, Moses, & Jones, 1987) |
Substance abuse impact reduced in 50% of families where it was a problem
Decrease in caregiver emotional problems
Increase in parenting skills for 65% of parents
Improved health of children
Decreased behavior problems of children
Some reduction in social isolation of caregivers |
| Family Network Project |
Outside evaluator
Comparison group
No random assignment
Two standardized scales
Intake, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, at closing, and at 6-month follow-up
Statistical analysis of data |
Maintain safe housing
Master the skills necessary to ensure appropriate activities of daily living
Ensure adequate health care
Master the skills necessary to ensure the psycho-emotional needs of family members
Master the skills necessary to ensure appropriate discipline |
Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (Bavolek, 1984 )
Family Profile
Eco-Map (Hartman, 1979)
Intake Packets (designed for program)
Child Well-Being Scales (Magura & Moses, 1987) |
Families maintained adequate housing
Families achieved adequate health care
Caregivers developed skills to meet children's psycho-emotional needs
Caregivers showed improvement in using appropriate discipline |
| Family Preservation Services |
Outside evaluator
Comparison group
Some random assignment
Seven standardized scales
CPS data - 12 months prior and 12 months postintervention; child and family data at intake, after intensive service and after care
Statistical analysis of data |
Reduce out-of-home placement of target children
Reduce re-referrals for neglect
Prevent referral for neglect for Outreach families |
Child Behavioral Checklist (Achenbach, 1991)
Battelle Developmental Inventory (Newborg, Stock, & Wnek, 1984)
Child Well-Being Scales (Magura & Moses, 1987)
Family Support Scale (Dunst, Jenkins, & Trivette, 1984)
Resource Scale for Teen Mothers (Dunst, Leet, Vance, & Cooper, 1988)
Strengthening Multi-Ethnic Families & Communities: A Violence Prevention Parent Training Program (Steele, Marigna, Tello, & Johnson, 1999)
Alaska Assessment for the Risk of Continued Neglect (used at intake) (Baird, 1988) |
Decrease in founded neglect reports and out-of-home placement
Child well-being increased from intake to the end of the intensive phase of services
Increases in family support and family resources |
| Family Reclaim |
Outside evaluator
No comparison group
Two standardized scales
Baseline and closure
No statistical analysis of data |
Improve the quality of parenting
Improve the quality home life
Improve the overall healthy development of children in areas of self-esteem and self respect
Provide services that are as or more effective than routine services at an acceptable cost, relative to benefit
Determine client/family characteristics that appear to respond best to the Family Reclaim model |
Child Well-Being Scales (Magura & Moses, 1987)
Family Well-Being Scale (developed for program) |
Improvement in child well-being scores
Improvement in family functioning for a significant number of families
97.5% of children at risk for removal were able to remain with their families
Improvement in children's academic performance and school attendance
Cost effective |
| Family Support and Intervention for Neglected Preschool Children |
In-house evaluators
Comparison group
No random assignment reported
14 standardized scales
Intake, conclusion, 1-year follow-up
Statistical analysis of data not completed yet |
Improve functioning for children and parents
For children: improve cognitive and pre-academic skills, language and communication skills, gross and fine motor skills, and socioemotional development
For families: improve skills in parenting, coping with stress, development of social networks, knowledge of appropriate developmental expectations, effective behavior management, positive interactions with children, lower rates of CPS reports, reductions in stress, and improvements in social supports |
Demographics Interview (Carlson & Cicchetti, 1979)
Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (preschool version, Caldwell & Bradley, 1984)
Parenting Dimensions Inventory (Slater & Power, 1987)
Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory (Bavolek, 1984)
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (Bernstein, Fink, Handelsman, & Foote, 1994)
Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (Cohen & Hoberman, 1983)
Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983)
Daily Hassles Scale of Parenting Events (Crnic & Greenberg, 1990)
Semi-Structured Free Play (Beeghly & Cicchetti, 1994)
Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised (Wechsler, 1989)
Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach, 1991)
Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning-Revised (Mardel-Czudnowski & Goldenberg, 1983)
Preschool Symptom Self-Report (Martini, Strayhorn, & Puig-Antich, 1989)
Maltreatment Classification and Rating System (Barnett, Manly, & Cicchetti, 1993) |
94% of families made progress on treatment goals
99% of children achieved at least one developmental goal
Improved parenting skills and increased social support for caregivers
Increased knowledge of child development and positive behavior management
Children's developmental adaptation exceeded that of control group |
| Healthy Families D.C. |
A series of three different outside evaluators
No comparison group
Eight standardized scales
Baseline and at developmental intervals
No statistical analysis of data |
Promote optimal birth outcomes, child health, child development, and school readiness
Foster positive parenting and successful parent-child interaction
Promote optimal family functioning and life outcomes
Prevent child abuse and neglect |
Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory, Short Form (MacPhee, 1981)
Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (Caldwell & Bradley, 1984)
Home Screening Questionnaire (Coons, Gay, Fandal, Ker, & Frankenburg, 1981)
Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (Bavolek, 1984)
Maternal Social Support Index (Pascoe, Ialongo, Horn, Reinhart, & Perradatto, 1988)
Carolina Parent Support Scale (Bristol, 1983)
Maternal Health Beliefs Questionnaire (based on Hochbaum, 1958, & Rosenstock, 1974)
Participant Satisfaction Survey (developed for program) |
Met objectives with regard to:
Healthy birth weights
Immunizations and well-care visits
Developmental screenings
Progress toward self-sufficiency goals
No cases of CA/N |
This material may be freely reproduced and distributed. However, when doing so, please credit Child Welfare Information Gateway.
|