![]() |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Home > Postadoption Services: A Bulletin for Professionals > Why Evaluate Postadoption Services?
Postadoption Services
Bulletin for Professionals
8. Why Evaluate Postadoption Services? Outcome evaluation of all services in these times of tight budgets is critical to sustaining effective programs. Postadoption services programs tend to use a combination of process and outcome evaluation strategies. (Barth, Wildfire, Lee, & Gibbs, 2002). The primary indicator used to evaluate outcomes of postadoption services is the rate of disruption and dissolution during the duration of the study. Other measures include parent and child satisfaction surveys, improvements in the parenting skills of adoptive parents, well-being indicators for adopted children, and whether communities were more aware and supportive of adoption. Challenges in Evaluating Postadoption Services. The lack of rigorous, systematic evaluation with clearly measurable outcomes by most postadoption programs has made it difficult to determine how postadoption programs that "succeed" differ from those that "fail." Tangible outcomes, such as prevention of adoption disruption or dissolution, are very difficult to track. Thus, it is challenging to conclusively prove that families would have had a negative experience without a program's intervention (Barth, Wildfire, Lee, & Gibbs, 2002). Other specific challenges to effective evaluation, identified in a review of the postadoption literature by Barth, Gibbs, and Siebenaler (2001) and in a synthesis of Adoption Opportunities grantees (Information Gateway, in press), include:
Promising Evaluation Strategies. Some pioneering programs have been able to overcome these common evaluation barriers to demonstrate how postadoption services lower the rate of disruption or dissolution over a specified period of time. The literature review by Barth, Gibbs, and Siebenaler (2001) suggests strategies for overcoming evaluation challenges, although the authors acknowledge that these efforts will demand more intensive and costly methods of research. Their suggestions, which could be implemented by postadoption programs themselves or by administrative evaluations of postadoption services, include:
This material may be freely reproduced and distributed. However, when doing so, please credit Child Welfare Information Gateway. |
||||||
|
|||||||