![]() |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Home > Interagency Collaboration > Implications for Administrators and Stakeholders
Interagency Collaboration
A Closer Look
Implications for Administrators and Stakeholders The work of the nine grant communities indicates that formalizing interagency collaboration is a foundational element for systems change. Given the fiscal challenges, the multi-system needs of children and families, and increased focus on outcomes, child welfare driven systems of care must resolve policy issues, identify community resources, reduce duplication and gaps in services, and improve access to effective services and supports from other organizations. For collaboration to be effective, all partner agencies must understand and agree that they will relinquish some control over processes, procedures, and resources in order to provide enhanced services to children and families and fulfill their mandates. Working within collaborative governance and interagency case planning environments, agencies and families can make tremendous strides in formulating and implementing more comprehensive care plans, as well as resolving policy issues and creating new policies that reflect the collaborative relationships developed within their systems of care. Collaborative relationships not only promote improved child and family outcomes but also strengthen partner agencies through blended funding to support care plans, coordinated data systems, and cross-agency staff training. Agencies can also better leverage State and local funds with Federal resources to sustain appropriate services. Stakeholders in communities across the country have recognized that no organization can be truly effective working in isolation and that collaborative governance, collaborative case plan development, knowledgeable leadership, strategic planning, timely implementation strategies, and accountability offer the greatest promise for improving outcomes for children and families, achieving system reform, and improving communities. The experiences of the nine communities involved in the demonstration initiative suggest several implications for action related to the development of new interagency collaboratives or the strengthening of existing collaboratives:
|
||||||
|
|||||||