![]() |
|
||||||||||
|
View My Cart: 0 Items |
|
|
Home > Preventing Child Abuse & Neglect > Evaluating Prevention Programs > Making an Economic Case > Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Cost-effectiveness analysis attempts to determine which practices and policies protect the greatest number of children for the lowest price. In this type of analysis, key measures of program effectiveness (outcomes) are identified, and different strategies to affect those outcomes are compared. Cost-effectiveness analysis might be used by an organization with a limited budget to determine which strategy prevents more cases of child neglect; or, if two strategies achieve similar benefits, it might be used to determine which of these is least expensive to implement. As with cost-benefit analysis, it is important first to establish a causal relationship between the program and the outcomes claimed, through a valid outcome evaluation. Outcome measures for child abuse prevention programs may include:
Programs also need accurate information about the cost of administering the program. Programs can then be compared by dividing program costs by a particular outcome (for example, cost per case of child abuse prevented). In general, one strategy is considered more cost-effective than another if it is:
Often programs are interested in more than one outcome. In this case, programs can evaluate multiple outcomes separately (e.g., cost per case of child abuse prevented and cost per case of child death prevented) or combine the outcomes into one measure, in a cost-utility analysis. Cost-utility analysis is a variant of cost-effectiveness analysis, where quality of life and life expectancy are combined into a summary measure. For more information about cost-utility analysis, see Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Methods and Applications (Henry Levin and Patrick McEwan).
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||